Legalize
Ferrets

After all, they’re called Domestic Ferrets!

Illustration promoting a LegalizeFerrets.org article titled "Can the State Have It Both Ways?" featuring California's Capitol, scales of justice, Petition 2025-003 stamped "Accepted for Further Consideration," and books labeled Administrative Procedure Act and Government Code section 11340.7.
Administrative Law

Reading the State’s Demurrer: Arguments That Don’t Easily Fit Together

California accepted Petition 2025-003 for further consideration, yet more than a year later it remains unresolved. In its demurrer, the State advances several legal arguments that appear difficult to reconcile. This article examines those arguments and asks a much larger question: Can a California agency accept a citizen petition, refer it internally, and never issue a final decision?

Read More »
Illustration of a ferret trapped in a bureaucratic Catch-22. The ferret stands inside a bear trap surrounded by legal documents, a locked filing cabinet labeled “Accepted – Petition 2025-003,” a staircase leading to a “Dead End” sign, conflicting “Proceed” and “Do Not Enter” signs, a judge’s gavel, and a clock with no hands symbolizing a stalled government process.
Department of Justice

Petition 2025-003: How Acceptance Became a Catch-22

We thought we had won. In June 2025, the California Fish and Game Commission unanimously accepted Petition 2025-003 for further consideration. More than a year later, there is still no decision, no explanation, and no end in sight. What looked like progress may have become the ultimate bureaucratic Catch-22.

Read More »
Featured image showing a ferret in front of the California State Capitol alongside legal documents marked “Petition 2025-003” and “Further Consideration,” illustrating the California ferret legalization lawsuit and questions about agency accountability under the Administrative Procedure Act.
Administrative Law

California Ferret Legalization Lawsuit Raises Major APA Questions

After nearly a year of “further consideration” on Petition 2025-003, California has finally responded to our lawsuit — not with scientific findings or a final decision, but with the argument that simply referring the petition for review may have satisfied the law. The case now raises a much bigger question: when citizens petition California agencies for regulatory change, does the Administrative Procedure Act require a meaningful answer, or can petitions remain in indefinite limbo?

Read More »