California accepted Petition 2025-003. Nearly 10 months later, the record shows no action.
Petition 2025-003 was accepted unanimously by the California Fish and Game Commission on June 11, 2025 and referred to the Department of Fish and Wildlife for evaluation. Nearly ten months later, there is still no written decision and no evidence that any evaluation has begun. We asked for the record. The response: no responsive documents. A writ of mandate has now been filed to compel action and accountability.
Petition 2025-003 was accepted in June 2025. On April 2, 2026, the Department of Fish and Wildlife responded to our PRA request by stating that it had conducted a diligent search and found no documents responsive to the request.
Read the official response (PDF)
In plain English: the petition was accepted — and then nothing happened.
California’s ferret ban has survived for decades through inherited assumptions, circular logic, and delay. This case asks a basic question: where is the actual administrative record showing a modern, evidence-based determination?
California now appears to want it both ways
For decades, California has treated ferrets as prohibited animals because the Fish and Game Commission determined that listed animals were “not normally domesticated in this state.”
But in the current litigation, the State’s demurrer appears to raise a very different question: whether the Commission may lack authority to undo or reconsider that same ferret classification.
The contradiction
If the Commission had authority to determine ferrets are not normally domesticated, why would it lack authority to reconsider that determination today?
That is now one of the central questions in the fight over Petition 2025-003.
Current court filings and source documents
We believe in letting the public see the documents for themselves. Below are key filings and historical records related to the current Sacramento Superior Court case and the long-running question of Fish and Game Commission authority over domestic ferrets.